Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 B.R. 13 - In re Sharak

In re Sharak’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334

Relies on Johnson v. Home State Bank · In Re: Stephen J. Jamo · In Re Carlton Dana Pratt · In Re Cruz · In Re Roush

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action, the employment of process, or an act, to collect, recover or offset any such debt as a personal liability of the debtor, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived. 11 U.S.C. § 524 (a)(2) (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n in rem foreclosure proceeding against mortgaged property that does not seek a judgment against a debtor personally after his or her debts have been discharged in bankruptcy does not violate the discharge injunction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Statements of an informational nature, even if they include a payoff amount, are generally not actionable if they do not demand payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.