Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 F.2d 209 - Nevett v. Sides

Nevett v. Sides’s Empirical Analysis

571 F.2d 209 · 1978

Citation profile

139
cited by 139 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
March 2019
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 139 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Thornburg v. Gingles (1986), City of Mobile v. Bolden (1980)

63 federal appellate · 3 district ·

74019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Washington v. Davis · Reynolds v. Sims · Yick Wo v. Hopkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an intensely local appraisal of the design and impact”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]loc voting may [also] be indicated by a showing under Zimmer of ... past discrimination in general ..., large districts, majority vote requirements, anti-single shot voting provisions and the lack of provision for at-large candidates running from particular geographic subdistricts”, or by”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he ultimate issue in a case alleging unconstitutional dilution of the votes of a racial group is whether the districting plan under attack exists because it was intended to diminish or dilute the political efficacy of that group.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.