Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 F.2d 370 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

571 F.2d 370 · 1978

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
8
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably United States v. Crawley (1988), 51 Cal. 3d 437 - People v. Rodriguez (1990)

24 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

200197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Stovall v. Denno · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · H. K. Porter Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Short

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation or] parole; (b) disclosure to the [probationer or] parolee of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body ... and (f) a written statement by the factfinder as to evidence relied on and reasons for revoking [probation or] parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.