Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 F.2d 462 - National Labor Relations Board v. Triumph Curing Center

National Labor Relations Board v. Triumph Curing Center’s Empirical Analysis

571 F.2d 462 · 1978

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 1999 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Don Burgess Construction Corp. (1979), Conair Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 222, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (1983)

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

380197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Katz · Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a union evidences total disinterest in enforcing its rights through the peaceful legal process provided by the Act and instead resorts to violence, the Board will refuse to issue a bargaining order, even though the employer violated the Act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) interrelation of operations, (2) common management, (3) centralized control of labor relations, and (4) common ownership or financial control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “obstructs the employees' right to determine whether they want the union to represent them, no bargaining order should be enforced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.