Cole v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
571 F.2d 590 · 1977
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2004 · most notably Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (1978), Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (1979)
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · United States v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · United States v. Public Utilities Commission · Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank · National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““any person who . . . moves from real property, or moves his personal property from real property, as a result of the acquisition of such real property, in whole or in part, or as the result of the written order of the acquiring agency to vacate real property, for a program or project undertaken by a Federal agency, or with Federal financial assistance;” 42 U.S.C. § 4601 (6).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A person who moves . . . as a direct result of any project or program which receives Federal financial assistance under title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, or as a result of carrying out a comprehensive city demonstration program under title I of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 shall . . . be deemed to have been displaced as the result of the acquisition of real property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The House bill would limit the status of displaced person to those who move as the result of the acquisition of, or written notice to vacate, real property. The Senate version would provide a broader definition which includes those who move as the result of acquisition or reasonable expectation of acquisition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.