Kulhawik v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
571 F.3d 296 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Puglisi v. United States (2009), Debeatham v. Holder (2010)
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Yan Chen v. Gonzales · Cao He Lin v. United States Department of Justice · Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Department of Justice · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya · Biao Yang v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An attorney's unsworn statements in a brief are not evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.