Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 F.3d 331 - United States v. Blake

United States v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

571 F.3d 331 · 2009

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
3
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Cole (2011), United States v. Cloud (2012)

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

680200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · United States v. Marion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person who 'has not attained his twenty-first birthday,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Polygraph results are generally inadmissible. However, 'testimony concerning a polygraph examination is admissible where it is not offered to prove the truth of the polygraph result, but instead is offered for a limited purpose such as rebutting a defendant's assertion that his confession was coerced.' [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “at the time he allegedly violated the law in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.