Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki’s Empirical Analysis
571 F.3d 699 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville · Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. New York State Liquor Authority · Pennell v. City of San Jose · Heckler v. Mathews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The case was dismissed prematurely, and must go back to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We intimate no view on the ultimate outcome; we are remanding because the plaintiffs were denied an opportunity to try to prove their ease.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“cannot say that the probability of [ ] a mode of compliance is so slight that the plaintiffs cannot show that they have anything to gain from winning their suit and so cannot be permitted to maintain it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. Malloy“not know what exactly [the State] would do to comply with a ruling invalidating [these laws],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. Malloy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.