United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
571 F.3d 791 · 2009
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Clabourne v. Ryan (2014), United States v. Donovan (2011)
17 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000) · 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Auer v. Robbins · Marks v. United States · Nichols v. United States · National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the district court's decision to admit expert testimony for abuse of discretion, according it substantial deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.