Doe v. Abbott Laboratories’s Empirical Analysis
571 F.3d 930 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman · Nixon v. Fitzgerald · Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state a claim under § 2 of the Sherman Act absent an antitrust refusal to deal (or some other exclusionary practice) in the monopoly market or below-cost pricing in the second market”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“allegations of monopoly leveraging through pricing conduct in two markets”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Verizon Commc'ns Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.