Keesling v. Baker & Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc. · In re Reinstatement of Tindal · Archem, Inc. v. Simo · Cacdac v. Hiland · Ludwig v. Ford Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'caleulated to mislead and hinder [him] from obtaining information by the use of ordinary diligence, or to prevent inquiry or elude investigation.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hughes v. Glaese · Martin v. Richey“[al non-movant may not create issues of fact by pointing to affidavit testimony which contradicts the witness's sworn testimony in a prior deposition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the doctrine of Active Fraudulent Concealment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hughes v. Glaese
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.