Hames v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Nealis v. Baird (1999), Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C. (1995)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dorsey · 94 Okla. Crim. 45 - Henderson v. State · Martin v. Griffin Television, Inc. · People v. Becker · Aetna Insurance v. Barnett Bros.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a law action the verdict of the jury is conclusive as to all disputed facts and all conflicting statements, and where there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict of the jury, this court will not disturb its verdict and judgment based thereon. . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“for reversal, there must be prejudice as well as the evidence being incompetent”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duke v. Duke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.