Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 So. 2d 1337 - Craft v. Kramer

571 So. 2d 1337 - Craft v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 237 So. 2d 163 - Beta Eta House Corp., Inc. of Tallahassee v. Gregory · 493 So. 2d 440 - Folta v. Bolton · 528 So. 2d 461 - DeSantis v. Acevedo · 535 So. 2d 699 - Allstate Ins. Co. v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of a medical injury shall not create any inference or presumption of negligence against a health care provider, and the claimant must maintain the burden of proving that an injury was proximately caused by a breach of the prevailing professional standard of care by the health care provider. However, the discovery of the presence of a foreign body, such as a sponge, clamp, forceps, surgical needle, or other paraphernalia commonly used in surgical, examination, or diagnostic procedures, shall be prima facie evidence of negligence on the part of the health care provider.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.