Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 SO2D 333 - Pardue v. State

Pardue v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
7
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 698 So. 2d 189 - Smith v. State (1996), 673 So. 2d 812 - Rolling v. State (1995)

59 state decisions

380199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ho'o · State v. Luna · Pardue v. State · 554 So. 2d 477 - Buchannon v. State · Buchannon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits the crime of burglary in the first degree if he knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with intent to commit a crime therein, and, if, in effecting entry or while in the dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, he or another participant in the crime:”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Jordan v. State · Pardue v. State
  2. ““A person commits the crime of burglary in the first degree when, in the course of committing a burglary, the person is armed with a deadly weapon. The statute does not require that the burglar be armed • prior to entering a dwelling. Rather, the burglar must be ‘armed with explosives or a deadly weapon’ at one of three points: 1) ‘in effecting entry’; or 2) ‘while in [the] dwelling ’; or 3) ‘in immediate flight therefrom.’ Clearly, under the statute, the burglar could conceivably be ‘armed’ at three different times during the course of the burglary.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bush v. State · Jordan v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.