Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 SO2D 372 - Barnes v. State

Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2015

14 state decisions

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth · 447 So. 2d 199 - Willis v. State · 405 So. 2d 76 - Jolly v. State · 417 So. 2d 625 - Chaney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Alabama a person commits the crime of attempt to murder if he intends to cause the death of another person and does any overt act towards the commission of that intent. Alabama Code 1975, Sections 13A-4-2 (the attempt statute), and 13A-6-2 (murder).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"`In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, this Court must accept as true the evidence introduced by the State, accord the State all legitimate inferences therefrom, and consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution.' Faircloth v. State , 471 So.2d 485 , 489 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd , 471 So.2d 493 (Ala. 1985). Where, moreover, the State establishes a prima facie case, conflicting evidence presents a jury question which is not subject to review on appeal. Willis v. State , 447 So.2d 199 , 201 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.