Knox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cherek v. United States · Boyd v. North Carolina · Roan v. State · 456 So. 2d 404 - Ex Parte Weeks · 381 So. 2d 668 - Smoot v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Ebens v. State , 518 So.2d 1264 -1267 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986) (quoting Roan v. State , 225 Ala. 428 , 435 , 143 So. 454 , 460 (1932)).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[T]he acts, declarations and demeanor of an accused before or after the offense whether a part of the res gestae or not are admissible against him. . . .' Smoot v. State , 381 So.2d 668 , 671 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`Any communication or contact outside the jury room about the matters at trial between a juror and another person is forbidden where that contact "might have unlawfully influenced that juror.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.