Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

571 So. 2d 408

Daniels v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1990

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1990-10-26

Relies on Daniels v. State

Decided 1990-10-26

¶1ON RETURN TO REMAND

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶2We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to inform appellant of his rights under the Youthful Offender Act and to hold a proper investigation and hearing. 567 So.2d 880. The trial court has complied with our instructions and has filed a return to remand showing that the court advised appellant of his rights under the Youthful Offender Act and that, with appellant’s consent, the court investigated him, examined him, and denied his request for youthful offender treatment under the Act. The proceeding below appearing proper and in compliance with our instructions, the judgment is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

¶3OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.
/571/so2d/408 · .json · Public domain