Hoffman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State (2000), 769 So. 2d 974 - Asay v. State (2000)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · 561 So. 2d 541 - Provenzano v. Dugger · 562 So. 2d 324 - State v. Kokal · 474 So. 2d 1178 - Hoffman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Without reaching the merits of any of these claims, we nevertheless believe that a hearing is required under rule 3.850. In its summary order, the trial court stated no rationale for its rejection of the present motion. It failed to attach to its order the portion or portions of the record conclusively showing that relief is not required and failed to find that the allegations were inadequate or procedurally barred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]ome greater degree of specificity....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pullum v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.