¶1This is an appeal from a corrected sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant’s arguments that the habitual offender statute is unconstitutional. See Pittman v. State, 570 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA), cause dismissed, 564 So.2d 488 (Fla.1990). We also disagree with appellant’s contention as to a lack of clarity in the correction and conclude that the corrected sentence eliminated the three-year minimum. Accordingly, we affirm.
571 So. 2d 583
Collins v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 28, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-12-28
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1991
2 state decisions
Relies on 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · 559 So. 2d 289 - Roberts v. State · 570 So. 2d 1045 - Pittman v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1990-12-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →