Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 S.W.2d 22 - Ex Parte Smith

Ex Parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 1996

12 state decisions

110197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Braxton v. State · Ex Parte Oliver · Ex Parte Wilson · Ex parte Muro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The indictment in the instant case alleges that [the defendant] ‘knowingly and intentionally during the course of the same criminal episode causefd] serious bodily injury . . ’ (Emphasis added) The criminal episode referred to is the act of sexual intercourse with the complaining witness. We hold that the emphasized phrase constitutes a sufficient allegation that [the defendant] knowingly and intentionally engaged in sexual intercourse.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““did then and there unlawfully engage in sexual intercourse with R— S — , a female then and there under the age of 17 years and then and there under the age of 14 years and not then and there the wife of the said [defendant] and the said [defendant] did then and there knowingly and intentionally during the course of the same criminal episode, cause serious bodily injury to the said R_ S_ . . ” (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.