Ex Parte Groves’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County (1981), Rose v. State (1988)
1 federal appellate · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))
Relies on Craig v. Boren · Reed v. Reed · Frontiero v. Richardson · Coker v. Georgia · McLaughlin v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy; and, ordinarily, neither a trial court nor this Court, either in the exercise of our original or appellate jurisdiction, should entertain an application for writ of habeas corpus where there is an adequate remedy at law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Townsend · Ex parte Reposa“"(a) A person commits an offense if he has sexual intercourse with a female not his wife and she is younger than 17 years."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kruger v. State · Vasquez v. State““Correction or reduction of sentence. — The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time. The court may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner and it may reduce any sentence within one hundred twenty (120) days after the sentence is imposed, or within one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt by the court of a mandate of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island issued upon affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal, or within one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt by the court of a mandate or order of the Supreme Court of the United States issued upon affirmance of the judgment, dismissal of the appeal, or denial of a writ of certiorari. The court may reduce a sentence, the execution of which has been suspended, upon revocation of probation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ware
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.