United States v. Apel’s Empirical Analysis
571 U.S. 359 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2687 (Defense Authorization Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 1382 · 50 U.S.C. § 797
Relies on United States v. Grace · Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. · Crandon v. United States · Cutter et al. v. Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction · United States v. Albertini
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e have never held that the Government's reading of a criminal statute is entitled to any deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.