Marina Management Corp. v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis
572 F.2d 43 · 1978
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2001
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc. · Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The silence of Connecticut’s courts . . . neither releases us from our responsibility nor lightens our burden. See Meredith v. Winter Haven, 320 U.S. 228 , 234, 64 S.Ct. 7 [10], 88 L.Ed. 9 (1943). In such circumstances, we must “do the best we can in estimating ‘what the state court would rule to be its law.’ ” Holt v. Seversky Electronatom Corp., 452 F.2d 31 , 34 (2d Cir. 1971), quoting Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc., 350 U.S. 198 , 209, 76 S.Ct. 273 [279] 100 L.Ed. 199 (1956) (Frankfurter, J., concurring).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we are unaware of any State procedure by which we could certify this question to the Connecticut courts.” Id. at 46 . The court further noted that to determine the Connecticut law by interpreting relevant state statutes was not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hume v. Hertz Corp.“The [Connecticut] license requirements furnish supervision and regulation of the real estate business and make possible the elimination of the incompetent and unscrupulous agent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.