Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 572 F.2d 455 - United States v. Evans

United States v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

572 F.2d 455 · 1978

Citation profile

325
cited by 325 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

249 federal appellate · 12 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 325 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Beechum (1978), United States v. Phillips (1981)

249 federal appellate · 12 district · 8 state decisions

170019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 203 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 20 U.S.C. § 1087A · 20 U.S.C. § 1087C

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Roviaro v. United States · Benton v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 325 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(t)he key factor involved in this determination of federal interest is the supervision and control contemplated and manifested on the part of the government.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The burden is on the movant to make specific factual allegations of illegality, to produce evidence, and to persuade the court that the evidence should be suppressed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.