Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 572 F.3d 1067 - Johnson v. Couturier

Johnson v. Couturier’s Empirical Analysis

572 F.3d 1067 · 2009

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
3
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 19 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Alliance for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell (2011), Thalheimer v. City of San Diego (2011)

21 federal appellate · 19 district · 3 state decisions

940200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1102 (§ 402 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1108 (§ 408 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (§ 409 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1110 (§ 410 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mertens v. Hewitt Associates · Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “invests the district court with discretion as to the amount of security required, if any.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person is a fiduciary with respect to a plan to the extent (i) he exercises any discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting management of such plan or exercises any authority or control respecting management or disposition of its assets ... or (iii) he has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of such plan.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.