Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 572 F.3d 198 - Baum v. Rushton

Baum v. Rushton’s Empirical Analysis

572 F.3d 198 · 2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

60200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Jorn

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.