Fautenberry v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
572 F.3d 267 · 2009
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3599
Relies on Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard · Harbison v. Bell · Fautenberry v. Mitchell · 129 S. Ct. 397 - Davis v. Georgia · Getsy v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon a finding that investigative, expert, or other services are reasonably necessary for the representation of the defendant, whether in connection with issues relating to guilt or the sentence, the court may authorize the defendant’s attorneys to obtain such services on behalf of the defendant and, if so authorized, shall order the payment of fees and expenses therefor....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baze v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.