State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians · Trail v. Christian · State v. Stone · Holmquist v. Miller · Bray v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(a) Each of the States ... listed in the following table shall have jurisdiction over offenses committed by or against Indians in the areas of Indian country listed ... to the same extent that such State ... has jurisdiction over offenses committed elsewhere within the State ... and the criminal laws of such State ... shall have the same force and effect within such Indian country as they have elsewhere within the State ... : "State or Territory of Indian country affected [¶ ... ¶] California .............................. All Indian country within the State." [¶ ... ¶]”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“state law is not applicable to Indians within Indian Country without the consent of Congress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. RMH
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.