Chandler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 91 Okla. Crim. 326 - Fry v. State · Lovell v. State · 76 Okla. Crim. 371 - Hill v. State · Dooley v. State · Hall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a review of the entire record reveals numerous irregularities that tend to prejudice the rights of the defendant, and where a cumulation of said irregularities denies the defendant a fair trial, the case will be reversed, even though one of said errors standing alone would not be ample to justify reversal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bechtel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.