Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 572 P2D 371 - Johnson v. Carman

Johnson v. Carman’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2020

12 state decisions

70197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co. · 8 Utah 2d 272 - Carlson v. Hamilton · 3 Utah 2d 59 - Jacobson v. Swan · Perkins v. Spencer · Skookum Oil Co. v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) An agreement, made in advance of breach fixing the damages therefor, is not enforceable as a contract and does not affect the damages recoverable for the breach, unless (a) the amount so fixed is a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the harm that is caused by the breach, and (b) the harm that is caused by the breach is one that is incapable or very difficult of accurate estimation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although we do not purport to lay down any specific percentage which will be considered unconscionable, to allow the seller to retain the $34,596.10 paid by buyer when seller's actual damages amount to only $25,650.00 would be grossly excessive and disproportionate to any possible loss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although these are reasonable factors to determine damages, they were not meant to be a rigid formula to be applied mechanically in every case. In determining equitable damages, the trial court may use whatever factors it finds most appropriate to achieve justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.