Lane v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. State · Ward v. State · 22 Okla. Crim. 252 - Cotton v. State · Crane v. State · Jaggers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen an objection to instructions does not appear in the record, it is not properly preserved for review by this Court, (citations omitted) In Lane v. State, 572 P.2d 991 (Okl.Cr.1978), this Court stated: ‘Defendant should have stated specifically why he objected to the instructions, and further, should have submitted proposed instructions to the court in writing, in lieu of the instructions which he deemed objectionable.’ Lane v. State, supra, at 993.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.