Le v. Johnstown Properties’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 418 So. 2d 493 - Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co. · 521 So. 2d 1123 - Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. · 459 So. 2d 1263 - Carter v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana St. Univ. · Carter v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF LA STATE UNIV. AGRICULTURAL & MECHANICAL COLLEGE
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plaintiffs cite Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., supra for the proposition that assumption of the risk no longer totally bars recovery. While this is true, it does not preclude the finding of 100 percent contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff under the doctrine of comparative fault. As stated by the Murray court: However, the key to a finding of no liability in such cases is not the plaintiff's subjective awareness of the risk, but the determination that the defendant did not act unreasonably vis-a-vis the plaintiff, or injure the plaintiff through the instrumentality of an unreasonably dangerous thing in his custody....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.