572 So. 2d 1368 - Larson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 80 later decisions

states following

October 2017

most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), 674 So. 2d 123 - Justice v. State (1996)

79 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · 487 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Whitfield · 464 So. 2d 552 - Vetrick v. Hollander · 400 So. 2d 791 - Goodson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“is so egregious as to be the equivalent of fundamental error.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Schotsch v. State · Reed v. State
“As a general rule, a condition of probation that burdens the exercise of a legal or constitutional right should be given special scrutiny. However, a defendant cannot successfully challenge every aspect of a prior order of probation simply because it infringes on some such rights. Most sentences and orders of probation have that effect, if only because they restrict liberty to some extent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Saidi v. State · 657 So. 2d 906 - Cassamassima v. State
“authority for a probation officer to supervise the counseling required of some defendants, so long as this discretion is to be used only for rehabilitative purposes and does not take on the character of an essentially judicial act.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Carter v. State · 705 So. 2d 632 - Law v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.