Desoto Parish School Bd. v. INA’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 281 So. 2d 728 - Karam v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company · 265 So. 2d 821 - Karam v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. · 543 So. 2d 68 - Ray Gibbins Certified Welders, Inc. v. Griggs · 428 So. 2d 1162 - Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Bordelon · 508 So. 2d 875 - Jackson & Jackson v. LA. OFFSHORE INS.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Any insurer which issues or delivers a policy or contract of insurance pursuant to the application or request of an agent or broker who is not authorized to represent said insured as an agent shall be deemed to have authorized such agent or broker to act on insurer’s behalf as payment of any premium on such policy or contract of insurance. The payment to an agent or broker shall be payment to the insurer with all resultant obligations and duties. (2) This Subsection establishes any agency relationship only for the matter of collection of premiums specifically referred to herein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Having reviewed the statute and the jurisprudence construing it, we believe that the obvious purpose of R.S. Sec. 22:1180 is to protect the insured.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.