Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 572 SW2D 956 - Whitaker v. State

Whitaker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Suarez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Sec. 4.05. (a) Except as authorized by this Act, a person commits an offense if he knowingly or intentionally possesses a usable quantity of marihuana. "(b) An offense under Subsection (a) of this section is: "(1) a felony of the third degree if he possesses more than four ounces; "(2) a Class A misdemeanor if he possesses four ounces or less but more than two ounces; "(3) A Class B misdemeanor if he possesses two ounces or less. "(c) The possession of marihuana may not be considered a crime involving moral turpitude. "(d) Except as otherwise provided by this Act, a person commits an offense if he knowingly or intentionally delivers marihuana. "(e) Except as provided in Subsection (f) of this section, an offense under Subsection (d) of this section is a felony of the third degree. "(f) An offense under Subsection (d) is a Class B misdemeanor if the actor delivers one-fourth ounce or less without receiving remuneration."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(f) An offense under Subsection (d) is a Class B misdemeanor if the actor delivers one-fourth ounce or less without receiving remuneration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(d) Except as otherwise provided by this Act, a person commits an offense if he knowingly or intentionally delivers marihuana.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.