Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

573 F.2d 1137

Docket No. 74-2154.

Oliphant v. Schlie

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1978-04-25

2 counsel of record

Relies on Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Oliphant v. Schlie

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-04-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably United States v. Ayers (1991), United States v. Mehrmanesh (1982)

52 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

29019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

Philip P. Malone (argued), Poulsbo, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2

Barry Ernstoff (argued), Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

ORDER

¶3

Before DUNIWAY and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.

¶4

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court in this case (Oliphant v. The Suquamish Indian Tribe, et al., --- U. S. ----, 98 S.Ct. 1011, 55 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978)), that Court having reversed the judgment of this court, 544 F.2d 1007, and remanded the case to us for further proceedings, it is hereby ordered:

¶5

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with directions to issue a writ of habeas corpus.

/573/f2d/1137 · .json · Public domain