Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 F.2d 998 - Nix v. Sweeney

Nix v. Sweeney’s Empirical Analysis

573 F.2d 998 · 1978

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Tarpley v. Greene (1982), Dean v. Gladney (1980)

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

19019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Monroe v. Pape · Beck v. State of Ohio · Rizzo v. Goode · City of Kenosha v. Bruno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to prevail on summary judgment [on the issue of probable cause], the evidence, including admitted facts and disputed facts viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, in the knowledge of the police officer ordering the arrest [or search], must conclusively establish probable cause. * * * Conflicting evidence on any issue would make that issue a jury question. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the pleadings * * * together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the uncertain benefits of the respondeat superior doctrine against the certain encroachment on limited local government revenues”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.