Cook v. Randolph County’s Empirical Analysis
573 F.3d 1143 · 2009
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2020
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973C (§ 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Reynolds v. Sims · Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]ile in the district court of the United States for the district and division within which such action is pending a notice of removal signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants in such action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he First and Thirteenth Amendments afford no greater protection for voting rights claims than that already provided by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hand v. Scott“he did not actually suffer a deprivation of any of the constitutional or statutory rights he asserts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hand v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.