Wavetronix v. EIS Electronic Integrated Systems’s Empirical Analysis
573 F.3d 1343 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Meyer Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. Bodum, Inc. (2012), 101 Fed. Cl. 416 - Thompson v. United States (2011)
4 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Warner-Jenkinson Company Inc v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show[ ] on a limitation-by-limitation basis that the accused product performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way with substantially the same result as each claim limitation of the patent[ ] ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.