Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 F.3d 237 - Mitan v. Duval

Mitan v. Duval’s Empirical Analysis

573 F.3d 237 · 2009

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
November 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably In Re Buttermilk Towne Center, LLC (2010), Meoli v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Teleservices Group, Inc.) (2012)

1 federal appellate · 6 district ·

230200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523

Relies on Gall v. United States · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Albany Partners Ltd Albany Partners Ltd v. Wp Westbrook Albany Partners Ltd Wp Westbrook Ww C · United States v. Bolds · Hardin v. Caldwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “bankruptcy courts, as courts of equity, may always consider the presence of bad faith on the part of one of the parties when fashioning relief,” id. at 245 ). See also Hopper v. Everett (In re Everett), 364 B.R. 711, 723 (Bankr.D.Ariz.2007) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.