Chedid v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
573 F.3d 33 · 2009
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on LOZADA · Stanislav Iavorski v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service · SILVA-TREVINO · Ruben Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · 25 I. & N. Dec. 1 - COMPEAN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) an affidavit explaining the petitioner's agreement with counsel regarding legal representation; (2) evidence that counsel has been informed of the allegations of ineffective assistance and has had an opportunity to respond; and (3) if it is asserted that counsel's handling of the case involved a violation of ethical or legal responsibilities, a complaint against the attorney filed with disciplinary authorities or, in the alternative, an explanation for why such a complaint has not been filed."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Medina v. Whitaker“even assuming equitable tolling were available, we could only reach the merits ... if the Board abused its discretion in finding that [petitioner] had not exercised the 'due diligence' required by our case law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Medina v. Whitaker“provide[ ] [any] information whatsoever regarding the actions he took during the one-year period immediately following”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gyamfi v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.