Barr v. Dramatists Guild, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. · Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inhere is no requirement that a plaintiff plead with particularity every overt act allegedly committed by a defendant in furtherance of a conspiracy or the precise role played by an alleged conspirator.”); Julius Nasso Concrete Corp. v. DIC Concrete Corp., 467 F.Supp. 1016, 1025 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (plaintiff”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It has been clear in this Circuit since Nagler v. Admiral Corp., 248 F.2d 319 (2d Cir.1957) (Clark, C.J.), however, that a short plain statement of a claim for relief which gives notice to the opposing party is all that is needed in antitrust cases, as in other cases under the Federal Rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. CBS, Inc. v. Ahern
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.