Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 NW2D 245 - State v. Pickett

State v. Pickett’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · State v. Harlan · State v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Law enforcement officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable seizures merely by approaching individuals on the street or in other public places and putting questions to them if they are willing to listen. Even when law enforcement officers have no basis for suspecting a particular individual, they may pose questions, ask for identification, and request consent to search luggage — -provided they do not induce cooperation by coercive means.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.