Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 N.W.2d 369 - State v. Danforth

State v. Danforth’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Idaho v. Wright · In Re Blodgett · State v. Lanam · State v. O'HAGAN · State v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the court is imposing an executed sentence, based on a sentencing guidelines presumptive imprisonment sentence or a dispositional departure * ⅜ ⅜ on a person convicted of committing or attempting to commit [first-, second-, third-, or fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct], or on a person convicted of committing [a predatory crime] if it reasonably appears to the court that the crime was motivated by the offender’s sexual impulses or was part of a predatory pattern of behavior that had criminal sexual conduct as its goal; (2) the court finds that the offender is a danger to public safety; and (3) the court finds that the offender needs long-term treatment or supervision beyond the presumptive term of imprisonment and supervised release. The finding must be based on a professional assessment by an examiner experienced in evaluating sex offenders that concludes that the offender is a patterned sex offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Given J.S.’s strong and substantially consistent statements regarding the abuse, his attention-deficit problems (which render him relatively impervious to suggestion and coaching), his apparent lack of motive to fabricate an allegation harming an avuncular figure, and the professionalism of the CornerHouse interview, we agree with the district court that the videotape was sufficiently reliable to be admitted into evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was sufficiently reliable to be admitted into evidence,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.