State v. Codianna’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Witherspoon v. Illinois · State v. Pierre · 24 Utah 2d 202 - State v. Scandrett · 21 Utah 2d 113 - State v. Poe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [I]n these proceedings, evidence may be presented as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentence, including, but not limited to the nature and circumstances of the crime, the defendant’s character, background, history, mental and physical condition, and any other facts in aggravation or mitigation of the penalty. Any evidence the court deems to have probative force may be received regardless of its admissibility under the exclusionary rules of evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.