Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

573 So. 2d 1037

State v. Hernandez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1991

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-02-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Adderly

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We summarily reverse the order granting an ore tenus motion to dismiss an information which charges the defendant with grand theft of an automobile. State v. Adderly, 411 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (a motion to dismiss an information must specifically allege the grounds on which it is based); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(a).1

¶2*1038Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

¶3. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(g), the State has a ninety day period in which to bring the defendant to trial following the date of receipt by the trial court of this mandate.

/573/so2d/1037 · .json · Public domain