Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 SO2D 1371 - Jordan v. McKenna

Jordan v. McKenna’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 612 So. 2d 1080 - Nicolaou v. State (1992), 578 So. 2d 624 - State Ex Rel. Moore v. Molpus (1991)

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

150199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Ashe v. Swenson · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here there is room for suspicion regarding the reliability of those first fact findings, collateral estoppel should never be applied.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(W)here a question of fact essential to a judgment is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, that determination is conclusive ... (against the party against whom it was made) in a subsequent suit on a different cause of action_ The unsuccessful party is precluded from relitigating the fact so found.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the rule is neither mandatory nor mechanically applied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.