¶1We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, we strike the provision in the judgment which assesses court costs against appellant, because the record indicates these costs were imposed without prior notice or the opportunity to be heard. Our decision is without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of costs after adequate notice to appellant.
573 So. 2d 449
Fleming v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 1, 1991
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-02-01
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1991
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-02-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →