Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 So. 2d 688 - Moore v. State

573 So. 2d 688 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2014

8 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State · Kirby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here one actively engages in any way in the prosecution and conviction of one accused of a crime, he is disqualified from sitting as a judge in any matter which involves that conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Mississippi Code Section 9-1-11 require[] that we reverse and remand so that another judge can rule on the merits of the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the judge who ruled on [the] motion was also the district attorney who signed the indictment in 1986.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.