Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 573 So. 2d 764 - Chisolm v. Eakes

573 So. 2d 764 - Chisolm v. Eakes’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2010

9 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc. · Smith v. Shaffer · 513 So. 2d 901 - Maxwell v. Illinois Central Gulf RR · 503 So. 2d 249 - Baker by Williams v. Williams · South Carolina Department of Social Services. v. Bacot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he jury may consider the expert testimony for what they feel that it is worth, and may discard it entirely.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the trial court must consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant, who must also be given the benefit of all favorable inferences that may be reasonably drawn from the evidence; if the facts and inferences so considered point so overwhelmingly in favor of the movant that reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict, granting the verdict is required; on the other hand, if there is substantial evidence opposed to the motion, i.e., evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions, the motion should be denied and the jury's verdict allowed to stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.